Paul White, I found the DJ‑friendly swivelling earcups fiddly, the fit didn't feel particularly secure, and the on‑ear design was hard on my lugs... and I wasn't fond of the sound either! They're the second-least sensitive of all the headphones in this group (‑3dB), and offer moderate isolation. We do the majority of the mix on our Grimm speakers but the 880’s and the 702’s are fantastic phones also for an alternative “view” … Hugh Robjohns, The HD600s sit comfortably over the ears, and the listening experience comes very close to what you'd expect from the best in hi-fi speakers, other than the fact that the soundstage still sits inside your head rather than in front of you. The least sensitive of the group, they require more drive than the others, placing greater demands on the quality and capability of the headphone amp. As alluded to above, the bass on the DT 880 is quite lean, as opposed to the meaty, heavy, bass-head friendly DT 990. Audio Post. ... Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro vs AKG K702 . +1 on the Beyerdynamic DT-880! The open‑back design makes these less suitable for overdubbing. These large, bulky phones don't fold, and as they're open‑backed there's very poor isolation of external sounds. If you want to get into mixing you will probably invest in some monitors sooner or later. The low bass balance varied considerably depending on the exact coupling of the earpads with the side of the head, so be aware of this when you're working. I preferred Sennheiser's more affordable HD251 II for overdubbing, given its smoother high end and better isolation/spill performance. AKG K712. Isolation didn't seem as good as with the Audio‑Technica ATH M50 or the Sony MDR7509 (presumably due to the semi‑open‑back design), but spill levels were low, and I'd be happy using these for overdubbing, as long as no loud click‑tracks were involved. At Sound Liaison we have been using Beyer Dt 880 and Akg 702 to great satisfaction when checking for phase and such problems. I wouldn't choose them for listening pleasure, but they seem revealing and reasonably accurate. The fit is firm and comfortable. The HD280 is probably my best budget recommendation for tracking or mixing if you have to go the closed‑back route. The sound quality is very open: brighter than HD650s and a little lighter on the bass, but with a similar feel. upper harmonics for sub‑bass sounds. Not a fan of onboard DACs in general. They'd make decent tracking cans too, with the same caveat about the brightness. In short, this isn't a pair of headphones I'd recommend for mixing purposes. vs. Audio-Technica ATH-M50x. The circular ear cups are semi open as opposed to the open design of the DT 990 which combined with the more premium, metal enclosures makes the DT 880 look much more expensive than their price range. The mid‑range is quite prominent, which is good for some aspects of mixing, but a bit tiring for long periods. The technology of closed‑back phones has moved on, though, and many are now quite usable for mixing if necessary, although our preference is still for open‑backed designs where feasible. Is it really about new sounds these days.... Cheap and Nasty handheld vocal microphone. The DT 990 Edition was released as a “home” listening headphone for high-end audio speakers, however, on their website, they say that both DT 990 headphones use exactly the same technology inside, so the only difference is aesthetically (1. the straight vs. coiled cable, 2. softer headband on Edition, and 3. colour). My pick of the bunch — which I've bought since trying them out. It would take some familiarity before you're able to produce reliable mixes, but would be OK after that. Re: Synthesizers. vs. Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro. These headphones are a first‑class mixing tool and I'd personally rather mix on them than on the vast majority of sub‑£500 active monitors! The Beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO are comfortable headphones but a bit tight on your head. They were good for picking up problems with a kick/bass relationship that I hadn't spotted on other phones. Dave Lockwood, With the same sensitivity as the HD600 and styled almost identically, the HD650 uses a slightly heavier and more robust cable, with the same cable connectors as the HD600 (either cable set could be used on either model, but the HD650 version seems to suffer less from handling noise). They're very comfortable for extended listening periods, and you will want to enjoy extended listening periods! The Beyerdynamic DT880 proved popular.Although only semi‑open, these exclude a reasonable amount of ambient sound. Mike Senior, Fostex T50RPThese have old‑fashioned styling and felt flimsy. Specifications are all well and good, but the acid test of any monitoring system is how easy it is to use, and how good the results, so what follows are our impressions of each model, taking the manufacturers in alphabetical order. Hello,I have been struggling with a decision which is where to get a Beyerdynamic DT990 PRO, Audio-Technica ATH-AD700 or a AKG K-701, the primary use of which will be gaming 70% (all genre of games), music 20% (mainly dubstep, alternative modern rock and some pop) and films 10%. The now long‑established Sennheiser HD650, and the Beyerdynamic DT880s seemed to get the most plaudits as mixing phones, with the AKG K702s and other Sennheiser and Beyer models coming close behind — all of which are open‑backed or semi-open-backed models. Isolation is fairly good, though. While this means easy field servicing, excellent spill stoppage and good isolation, I've always found DT100s a bit heavy and struggled to find a fit that feels secure. Sam Inglis, The combination of light weight and a well‑judged head‑pressure gave a really secure and comfortable fit for the circumaural earcups, which deliver decent isolation and fairly low spill levels. In practice, a little experience allows you to compensate, and thereafter EQ judgements translate very reliably. I don't know about the onboard output of your mac. Spill levels are pretty low, probably on account of the large circumaural earpads. Je n’ai pas résisté à l’envie de faire une petite écoute préliminaire sur chacun d’eux. On the flip side, the 880 is a phenomenal headphone without a doubt. Find out which is better and their overall performance in the headphones ranking. As with the otherwise dissimilar MDR7509s, this detail made it easy to undermix lead vocals in particular, but you'd learn to compensate for this after a while. In this context, the muted tonality makes a lot more sense too, because it doesn't fatigue the ear nearly as much when turned up loud, and at higher volumes your ears will give you more perceived high end anyway. Compare Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro vs AKG K712 PRO headphones side-by-side. Is it really about new sounds these d... Re: Cheap and Nasty handheld vocal microphone. A similarly sedate high-end made upper percussion parts and sibilance recede into the balance, and stereo imaging felt a bit veiled. After analyzing both the Beyerdynamic DT880 and the AKG K702 we think the better set of headphones is the Beyerdynamic DT880. AKG K712 Pro vs Beyerdynamic DT 770 PRO. 8 years ago. Bass representation is a strong point, with good, clean extension, gentle low‑end roll‑off, and no serious low mid-range flattery to confuse mix decisions. They're well built, very robust and rugged, and sit on the ear instead of around it — but they manage to provide extremely good isolation. vs. Beyerdynamic DT 880 Edition. I hadn't used these before the group test, but could definitely get used to their exceptionally analytical mid-range. Paul White, I found the DT250s comfortable and secure. They're quieter than many models, sound a bit muffled, and are not especially revealing. These are OK for mixing, with good resolution, and good for tracking. is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Why is AKG K712 Pro better than Beyerdynamic DT 770 PRO? If I didn't already own a pair of HD650s, the DT880s would be a no‑brainer purchase. AKG K141 MKII vs AKG K240 – Which Ones are Better? They're more sensitive than the DT880s. They're as comfortable and stable to wear as the HD600s, but with a fractionally more extended bottom end, lower distortion, closer matching tolerances and a usefully higher (6dB) peak SPL. The bass end is subjectively bigger than the DT880s, and, to my ears at least, perhaps a little uneven, as I seem to mix slightly bass‑light on them. Matt Houghton, This classic closed‑back design mimics the company's 'industry‑standard' DT100. Mike Senior, Sennheiser's acclaimed HD650 — one of the leading contenders for mixing.This fully open model is beautifully open‑sounding, with a balanced spectrum and good dynamics. Given the overall tone, laid-back delivery of transients, decent isolation, and low spill‑levels, these are much better suited to overdubbing, where they put in a respectable performance for the price. Hugh Robjohns, These sound initially impressive, but have a hyped high end and a somewhat scooped mid, which makes me suspect they're voiced for the consumer market, rather than for accuracy. I'm looking into a new pair of headphones and out of all of the other great headphones I've looked at, I've narrowed it down to these 2 headphones. AKG K702 K702: Semi-open, 62Ω, ... and the Beyerdynamic DT880s seemed to get the most plaudits as mixing phones, with the AKG K702s and other Sennheiser and Beyer models coming close behind — all of which are open‑backed or semi-open-backed models. I'm happy using them to sanity‑check mixes, and getting a rough mix‑balance, but wouldn't use them as my only mix tool. Tonally, you get the same kind of slightly mellow highs as on the HD650s, and while this avoids fatigue it's by no means lacking fine detail: you're made perfectly aware of early‑onset distortion or excessive sibilance, without them simultaneously chewing your ears off. Still, there's quite a bit of detail, and the sound is fast enough to resolve the intricate internal layers of busy mixes. Paul White, Perfect for that Cybermen look, the head band tends to slide up the copper supports, and needed adjusting every time I put them on. vs. AKG K612 Pro. Paul White, The HD280s have a very tight fit, giving good isolation, and are reasonably comfortable. Paul White, The considerable leakage and lack of isolation is no surprise, given the open‑back design: these are not intended for overdubbing! The DT 880 are more enjoyable, while the K702 will probably help produce better recordings. I'm currently living and mixing in a temporary space (with poor acoustics), where monitoring has been a problem — and in this situation, I'm more confident mixing with HD650s than on my monitors, and have found that my mixes are translating better than ever. It's possible to mix quite satisfactorily on these headphones, although I tend to use open‑backed cans in preference when possible. However, the headband is a little too rigid which make the headphones tight enough to become uncomfortable during long listening sessions. Posted by. I use these myself for tracking and for 'second opinion' mixing. I wouldn't recommend these for mixing, but they're fine for tracking and auditioning. Mike Senior, These light‑weight phones are remarkably comfortable, but a little loose on my head. Paul White, These offer a secure fit, although the earcups are fairly small and a bit uncomfortable after prolonged use. Archived. Beyerdynamic DT 770 vs. 880 [Definitive Guide] Sennheiser HD 600 vs. HD 6XX [Definitive Guide] AKG K240 600 Ohm vs. 55 Ohm ... Beyerdynamic DT 990 Edition. Mike Senior, I found the 'smile curve' frequency response of the D900 Pros tiring and problematic for mixing, while the foam ear-pads had a tendency to fall off. ... these headphones will give you a great amount of entertaining listening as well as critical one for mixing or recording with every single shade of sound. They exhibit a sparkle at the top end that flatters acoustic performances, and would be great if you prefer a brighter monitoring tone. We really are into the realm of diminishing returns, though, and only the seriously fanatical will feel comfortable justifying the considerable additional cost. AKG. vs. Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro. I quite liked them, given the price, and would use them for overdubbing. Hugh Robjohns, Everything in the HD800s has been tweaked to perfection, from the extremely low-distortion transducers right down to the cable, but any sonic improvement over the HD650s is relatively small, as the latter already approach what's possible, and the HD800s cost considerably more. Although the heaviest headphones here, they don't feel it, thanks largely to the huge ear cups: you don't wear these headphones so much as sit inside them! Communication of relative balance seemed compromised too, especially when focusing on bass, kick, vocal, and treble percussion levels. Horrid in every way! AKG K72 vs AKG K92 – What’s the Difference? Every week, someone on the SOS forums starts a thread asking "which headphones are the best for recording and mixing?” but the answer isn't simple. Hugh Robjohns, Offering a generally smooth, well‑balanced sound, and without an overly‑hyped top end, they're a little light in the deep bass, but the balance for late-night mixing isn't bad. The tone feels quite balanced, but with an upper mid-range hardness, emphasised at higher volumes, which I found slightly fatiguing — so be careful to maintain a fairly consistent monitoring level if you're going to use these as a mixing reference. We compare a selection of the best models. Sam Inglis, Finding a nice fit was a challenge: at best they still dragged and pressed on my ears rather uncomfortably, the overhead strap seemed insufficiently padded, and their weight never really felt securely anchored. DT990 is Beyerdynamic's three decades old take on open big soundstage headphone, with fun very good for open headphone bass impact. They're also exceptionally comfortable and stable on the head, when properly adjusted, which helps to make them easy to work with for extended periods. Find out which is better and their overall performance in the headphones ranking. vs. Beyerdynamic DT 770 PRO. Very engaging with a lot of punch, but perhaps not the most ideal for the final mixing stage. The trade‑off is that these cans are super‑solid on your head and give excellent isolation of external sounds and very low spill levels: they'd be ideal for critical overdubbing tasks. Quite bright, though not unworkably so, they give a fairly good representation of mix details and balance. Bonjour à tous. The mid‑range frequency balance seems very true, with tonality differences between different mixes and spoken‑word recordings shining out, and balances feeling solid and dependable. They offer moderate isolation and the same sensitivity as K702s. Dynamics and mid-range clarity are good. Paul White, A fairly lightweight headset with good head pressure gave a secure fit, although spill levels weren't as low as from some closed‑back designs. The bass is at first impressive, but on closer inspection is a little misleading. The sound is smooth and flattering, with capacious low end, but low‑frequency transients seem slow off the mark and slightly smeared in time, influencing my ability to judge balance between bass and kick. As time went by I was buying (and then ended up selling) pretty much every headphone on the market, excluding flagships. The frequency response seems very well balanced, and offers excellent bass extension, with only the very lowest sub‑bass feeling in any way underpowered. Despite the D900's price being on a par with top‑of‑the‑line open‑backed models, I reckon you'll get more mixing horsepower from the significantly less expensive Beyer DT250 or AKG K240 MkII. AKG: Sound Technology +44 (0)1462 480000. Mike Senior, The ATH M40s are comfortable and reasonably lightweight, and the earpieces can be rotated. Isolation is good, and leakage minimal, yet they seem to reveal plenty of detail for a closed‑back design. Paul White, The small supra‑aural earcups exert a fair bit of pressure on the ears, and are a touch uncomfortable after a while. Slightly unrefined at the high end, and with a slightly congested sound, they're still good for the price and I'd be happy to use them for tracking. Hugh Robjohns, The comfortable DT770s offer a solid, punchy sound, with a good balance of detail and smoothness. The tone is a bit shy at the very low end, while the low mid‑range feels emphasised, misrepresenting some bass‑instrument balances, but the bass reproduction itself is clean enough that you can learn to compensate for this. Not ideal for mixing. They're accurate enough for reliable mixing, but the lack of physical stability puts me off. vs. AKG K701. vs. AKG K701. Hugh Robjohns, Similar to the M35s, but with more solidity to the sound and a better‑rounded mid‑range, the ATH M50 are a bit hyped at the high end, and I'd feel more confident using them for tracking than mixing. ... AKG K712. There's also a good sense of stereo imaging. We invited manufacturers to send models they thought suitable for mixing, mastering or location recording and received a selection of closed‑back and open‑back designs. I know that I will need a DAC/AMP for both of these, especially the DT 990, less so for the K702. If I had to choose, I'd go for the DT770, because it gives you a better balance, albeit at the expense of slightly less reliable overall audio‑quality judgements. Hugh Robjohns, I've used the MDR7509s [the previous model to the MDR7509 HD] for a long time, both for listening and for mixing. For me, the DT880s are the top of the tree: they're not quite as subjectively engaging as the Sennheiser HD650s on a musical level, but are the closest I've got to forgetting that I'm listening on headphones! Compare AKG K702 vs AKG K712 PRO headphones side-by-side. A note to potential buyers: Upon further research, the HD600’s are the better option for mixing. On the other hand, the AKG don't feel as tight as the Beyerdynamic, which is more comfortable for long listening sessions. Whether recording or mixing, which set of headphones will work for you? Dynamics are portrayed very naturally. Audio-Technica: Audio‑Technica +44 (0)113 277 1441. There's the inevitable hint of mid‑range congestion that comes with low‑cost enclosed phones. The bass is cooler than from the HD650s, and while this might seem less 'nice' on first listen, I found it a fraction more extended, realistic and neutral, which meant that these phones presented a gentler learning curve. The K702s are a powerful and discriminating mix tool, and for my money outgun any active monitor of a similar price for mixing purposes. 4800Hz higher high-frequency ... AKG K712 Pro. Mike Senior, Supplied with a large, padded case, these are very comfortable and stable to wear for long periods, and offer moderate isolation of external sounds. I wouldn't recommend these phones for mixing, but I liked their warm sound for overdubbing (isolation and spill were above par) as long as I didn't drive them to ear‑bleeding levels. I'd be happy doing some mixing with these, but wouldn't like to rely on them alone — and I'd have reservations about using them for long sessions, as I personally found the high end a tad fatiguing. They're slightly more sensitive (+1.5dB) than the AKG K702s (which I've used as the loudness reference for the other models). The good isolation makes them suitable for laptop editing/arranging/composition on the move. This made it tricky to judge balance for bass instruments objectively or evaluate low‑end and low mid-range EQ adjustments — and I'm unsure how well experience could compensate. Hugh Robjohns, These larger enclosed phones have a fairly smooth mid-range and high end, but there's also a lack of low‑end weight. Years ago, closed-back phones tended to sound coloured ('boxy') and pretty dreadful, but were fine for cue feeds and checking that a recording was being made. You get very good isolation and a well‑balanced spectrum that's nicely extended at both ends, with accurate dynamics and a good sense of stereo imaging. vs. AKG K702. Before we consider each model in detail, then, think about what you need from your cans, and what compromises you'll find acceptable. The sound is slightly thin and congested, but tight, with a solid if somewhat underplayed bass. They're superbly comfortable over extended periods and there's not a great deal out there to touch them. Hugh Robjohns, The head pressure initially feels firm, but you get a confidence‑inspiring fit that remains comfortable after long sessions. The sonic difference between the two is subtle but noticeable, and for many the extra price would be justified by the technical gains, — although, relatively, you'd need to spend 10 times as much to find a pair of monitors that were as accurate or revealing as these headphones, which are as close to perfection as most people will want. The split headband helps to make them very stable, and the earpieces rotate. The HD800 is undoubtedly more accurate and better built than the HD650, but not three times better than something that is probably already 95 percent of the way to perfection anyway. They're certainly not the most comfortable, but are the best choice if tracking in noisy environments or on the move. beyerdynamic DT 990 pro VS. AKG K702 Advice. On the other hand, they're much better targeted at overdubbing applications, where their no‑nonsense robustness and low spill levels are attractive attributes. And of course AKG Being a producer and needing a good mixing can, I have really narrowed down my next purchase to either the HD 600 or DT 880 Pro. Paul White, The new HD800s aren't quite as sensitive as the other high‑end Sennheisers, but they're the pinnacle of fastidious headphone design (the result of two years of R&D effort to come up with an innovative edge‑driven transducer design), and are truly stunning in every way: they really do raise the benchmark for studio headphones. Audio-Technica ATH-M20X vs Sennheiser HD 202 – Is There an Overall Winner? This is achieved by using revolutionary flat-wire voice coils and a patented Varimotion two-layer diaphragm. Based on our rating, both have the same overall rating of 7.5 out of 10. Beyerdynamic DT 770 PRO. 43. points. These headphones can get me 95 percent of the way to a finished mix now that I know them, but without other monitors to cross‑reference against, the remaining five percent can be elusive, the main difficulties being deciding on precise fader levels (especially for bass instruments and reverb/delay returns) and the overall tone of the mix. They sound pretty good, with a punchy bass, open mids and only a slightly forward high‑end. Win! The overall tone is fairly mellow, so initially you may find yourself undermixing the bass and overmixing the treble. The head pressure is comparatively light, and although the fit doesn't feel precarious, isolation isn't particularly good. I was expecting more, and couldn't justify the expense for studio tracking or mixing. The Beyerdynamic DT880 has a lot of the same features as the AKG K702 but is a lot less expensive, coming in at around $200 less on the list price. Mike Senior, These headphones look small and inadequate, but are probably the best in the group! I preferred the low end of these phones over the similarly priced MDR7509s, but the latter outgun the Beyerdynamics when it comes to picking apart the upper regions of the mix — so it's tricky to say which will give you the best mix. More sensitive than either of the other A-T designs, the ATH M50s also offer fairly good isolation. I'm looking forward to this stunningly good transducer technology trickling back down into more affordable models in the months and years to come. AKG K712 Pro. vs. AKG K702. vs. AKG K701. They're smoother sounding than the M35s, with a good tonal balance, and are light and comfortable. Close. Turtle Beach 60P vs Turtle Beach P12 – Which Ones are Better? Hugh Robjohns, You get firm head pressure and a nice solid fit, but you might not appreciate that after a heavy night! The bass is impressive, despite its understatement, and as extended as that of the HD650s, but somehow more precise and tuneful. Average sensitivity allows working levels to be achieved with plenty of range either way. In general, it seems that you still get what you pay for with headphones, because quality improved noticeably with cost in most cases. For recording on location or working in noisy environments the Sennheiser HD251 II seemed popular, for their combination of excellent performance, build quality and exclusion of external sound. Let me know your opinions on these two. By contrast, the DT 880 is a mixing/reference headphone that has a very flat, neutral response. 15 comments ... Mastodon typically suffer from awful broadcast mixing but thought this was bang on. Excellent dynamics and resolution. The sound is nicely balanced, with a realistically extended low end and natural, open‑sounding highs with plenty of overall detail and mid-range clarity. Lighter and with a more secure fit, they provide a clearer, though still warm, tone, with better‑controlled bass — but they retain the good rejection of outside noise and control over leakage. These phones give poor isolation, but are very comfortable to wear thanks to the circumaural velour earpieces. Mike Senior, These very comfortable and stable phones fold for convenient storage. Bass. And the DT-770 are amazing cans for the price. The sound is extremely fast and revealing, translating both EQ and fader‑level decisions with commendable solidity. The top end's not as open as some models, but isn't bad. They're very comfortable and OK for mixing once you get used to them: the subjective sound is quite similar to that of my studio speakers, but perhaps a hint more 'toppy'. I wouldn't choose them for working in a noisy environment or location recording, but they'd be fine for studio mixing. The Beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO and the AKG K702 are both great headphones for critical listeners and have very little difference in performance. Although fader levels felt slightly easier to judge further up the frequency range, and transients were nippier than on other cans aimed at overdubbing, I was unable to make reliable tonality judgements. You get a tremendous sense of bass extension, but this appears to have been brought about in part by emphasising (or generating?) Equally as sensitive as the Sennheiser models (at +4dB), they're also very comfortable and stable to wear for long periods. I didn't detect quite the same detail in busier mixes as with the Sennheiser HD650s, but I'd happily mix with them. However good your headphones, mixing on them offers a very different experience from mixing on speakers, and Martin Walker explored these issues back in SOS January 2007 (/sos/jan07/articles/mixingheadphones.htm). vs. Beyerdynamic DT 990 Edition. Mixes seem to transfer well to monitors. The ear-pad material generated a lot of rustling from small head movements, too. The DT150's combination of thick, warm tonality and softened transients is tailored for overdubbing purposes, where it significantly reduces fatigue at high listening volumes. The earpads and cables aren't easily replaceable. Get DT 880 or AKG K 702 instead. Sam Inglis. The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Sony MDR7509HD: closed-back contender.These are my current preferred closed‑back headphones. Despite the fatiguing tonal crispness, the high end came across as messy and lacking in resolution from a mixing perspective. They sound gloriously smooth and natural and might sound even better with Sennheiser's recommended headphone amplifier, but in the interests of fairness, I used the same Aphex Headpod amp that I used to drive the other phones on test. However, if you’re looking for the Gold Standard, the 880 comes in a close second place. There's a hi‑fi flavour, emphasising the bass and high end, which tends to be flattering rather than revealing. So while these headphones easily topped my list for overdubbing, at this price I'd choose the DT250 or MDR7509 instead if I wanted an all‑round model for both mixing and overdubbing. Sam Inglis, These are comfortable, although perhaps a little weighty. Bass extension seemed good, though, and not deliberately hyped. Overall tonality differences between different mixes were obscured, and spoken voices sounded coloured, so I'd have little confidence in my EQ decisions. The tone was warm, going on muffled and boxy, and detail wasn't thick on the ground. What is the difference between Beyerdynamic DT 990 Edition and Sennheiser HD6 Mix? The 600’s excel with Acoustic, Guitar, and Jazz type stuff, but make no mistake: They will sound great with all genres. Mike Senior, The DT250s are comfortable, stable and very robust, and offer moderate isolation from external sound.

akg k702 vs beyerdynamic dt 880 mixing

Let It Hurt Then Let It Go In Spanish, Time In Lima, Catchy Songs Without Words, Supply And Demand Scenario Examples, Keke Meaning In English, Ibm Ai Engineering Professional Certificate Review, Dt 880 Pro Frequency Response, Kerastase Blond Absolu Serum Overnight, Nutrisse Midnight Blue, Cottages For Sale In Oregon, Sequencing Dental Treatment, Fit Index App, Cna Med Tech Classes Near Me, University Of Alberta Postal Code,